|
|
Post by syracuse on Apr 29, 2004 19:29:20 GMT -5
Two hours to three hours for each game in some tournaments is absolute laughable matter. I do not need that too much time. I can make a decision for every move in less than five minutes.
|
|
Nemmers
Pawn
The One, The Only
I
Posts: 22
|
Post by Nemmers on Apr 30, 2004 11:16:17 GMT -5
Okay, that's your opinion. But the question is do you often win your games by taking only five minutes per move?
Regards,
Matt
|
|
|
|
Post by Karagianis on May 7, 2004 18:42:05 GMT -5
Two hours to three hours for each game in some tournaments is absolute laughable matter. I do not need that too much time. I can make a decision for every move in less than five minutes. better question = what's your rating? unles it is 2200+ i suggest that you probably should take more time per move, or just play in blitz tournaments. |
|
|
|
Post by syracuse on May 9, 2004 21:38:07 GMT -5
My rating is one million and it will impress everybody.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bishop Ocelot on Jun 9, 2004 14:20:14 GMT -5
funny 5 minutes a move is a LONGER game than even G/3 (5*40 =200). Don't play chess syracuse if you can't multiply- you're wasting your time, and your opponents
|
|
Brashaw
Pawn
"Why doesn't it work?!"
Posts: 11
|
Post by Brashaw on Jun 20, 2004 13:37:16 GMT -5
I don't think 3 hours is a very long game. I last year played in the Class Championships in August and took 33 minutes on one critical move (Even though I did'nt win). If you read the book "How to Think Like a Grandmaster" by Kotov, you will read that it takes a long time to develop a system in your mind to find the "correct" move.
|
|
|
|
Post by syracuse on Sept 15, 2004 18:33:57 GMT -5
If I learned much about endgame skills, then I can complete the games in less five minutes.
|
|
runewell
Pawn
bridge-playing actuary
Posts: 8
|
Post by runewell on Nov 13, 2008 20:40:17 GMT -5
Syracuse, you excel at the hypothetical  |
|
